Investing with Komplete Investments

At Komplete Investments, we approach capital management with an emphasis on context, judgment, and responsibility. Markets are influenced by shifting economic conditions, policy decisions, and long-term structural forces, and meaningful outcomes are rarely the result of isolated actions. The insights shared here are intended to support thoughtful consideration rather than immediate response. Each post offers perspective on how broader market dynamics and strategic principles intersect over time.

These articles are provided as educational resources designed to encourage informed evaluation and constructive discussion. They are not prescriptive in nature, but meant to complement disciplined oversight and individual decision-making. We recognize that effective capital management requires alignment with personal objectives, risk considerations, and long-term priorities. By engaging with this content as part of a broader framework, readers can better assess how insight, structure, and consistency contribute to sustainable outcomes across market cycles.

NonFarm Payrolls, Confirmation Bias edition

NonFarm Payrolls, Confirmation Bias edition


 

 

Today’s (belated) nonfarm payroll report had a little something for everyone. Whether you are bullish or bearish, recession or expansion, MAGA or Never Trump, there were nuggets of data in the report for you.

My charge is to put this into a broader context minus the bias.

Let’s jump into the specifics: The Bureau of Labor Statistics saw upside surprises in Jobs, Wages, and Unemployment Rate, and downside surprises to hiring breadth1 and annual revisions.

– Total nonfarm payroll rose 130,000 in January (double consensus)

– Unemployment rate fell to 4.3% (7.4 million unemployed)

– Average hourly earnings rose by 15 cents (0.4%) to $37.17

These figures are all higher than they were a year ago: the U3 jobless rate was 4.0%; the number of unemployed people was 6.9 million. Wages were also lower – $35.87 in January 2025. The gains were narrow and likely more seasonal than usual; there were also seasonal distortions that favorably adjusted for January layoffs in education (new term) & construction (bad weather).

The biggest surprise was the annual benchmark revision. 2025 was far worse than many (most?) previously thought. Total job creation for the year was slashed to just 181,000. That downward revision of 898,000 jobs (seasonally adjusted) was the second-largest negative adjustment on record, trailing only the 2009 financial crisis.

Here is what annual job revisions look like:

Average monthly revisions:
2025: -86k
2024: -94k
2023: -52k
2022: -8k
2021: +161k
2020: -29k

Totally revisions
2025: 1,208k to 181k (-1,027k overall)
2024: 2,589k to 1,459k (-1,130k)
2023: 3,140k to 2,515k (-625k)
2022: 4,619k to 4,526k (-93k)
2021: 5,331k to 7,268k (+1,973k)
2020: -8,893k to -9,246k (-353k)

The benchmark revisions also revealed that the labor market contracted in 2025 in four separate months—January, June, August, and October.

My confirmation bias?  It’s all about tariffs. They are the underlying cause of the weakness in the 2025 labor market.

The chart at the top only shows monthly changes in NFP—not the absolute level of employment. When we examine total employment levels, we find 2025 to be an appreciably worse labor market than 2023 or 2024. Have a look at this chart via the Hiring Lab:

This chart shows that the further we get away from the giant 2020-21 fiscal stimulus, the more the economy softened. Not coincidentally, the weakening jobs market coincided with a decline in CPI inflation from its June 2022 peak.

While we have seen substantial revisions in each of the past 5 years, it’s telling that those were from much higher levels. The current data suggest we are in a “low-hire, low-fire” environment; this may be contributing to the decline in consumer sentiment.

But I am not in the recession camp (yet); I’d put the odds of a first-half 2026 contraction at about 25% and in the second-half of 2026 closer to 40%. Not a high probability of recession, but if we see further economic missteps, a recession might be the result. (I know, pretty wishy-washy).

My main takeaway is the labor market is showing cracks and signs of stress; it looks increasingly fragile, even as equity markets hit all-time highs.

~~~

These revisions to 2025 are legitimately alarming. Hiring breadth remains way too narrow. And the data itself is arguably less reliable than it used to be. Interpreting NFP reports has become more challenging than ever…

 

 

 

Previously:
IEEPA Tariffs Update (January 27, 2026)

Where is the Tipping Point? (September 22, 2025)

NFP Disappoint; Revisions Worse (August 1, 2025)

7 Increasing Probabilities of Error (February 24, 2025)

Risks & Opportunities of the New Administration (February 3, 2025)

 

 

__________

1. Beneath the headlines, the breadth of hiring was very alarmingly narrow. Of those 130,000 new jobs, health care and social assistance accounted for 95% of the total.

 

 



Source link

Expand Energy: Increases Expected Merger Synergies By $200 Million Per Year
  • All of the Jobs That No Longer Exist

    Heading into the 19th century, about 70-80% of all jobs in the industrial world were in agriculture. Most people were farmers. By 1870, more than half of all men owned or performed labor on farms. Today less than 1% of the U.S. population works in agriculture. Innovation and technology made farming more efficient, so people…

  • RWM Coming to San Francisco April 14-16

      I am very excited to announce that RWM is coming to San Francisco, California, on April 14th. Our relationship with the City by the Bay goes back to the early days when Josh, Kris, Michael and I would spend a few days here meeting clients. The tech center of the world is filled with…

  • Animal Spirits: Everyone Hates AI

    Aim beyond the horizon with our active muni ETFs Navigating today’s complex muni universe requires precision, and index strategies can fall short. Our solution: the industry’s largest active muni ETF lineup–national ETFs and seven single-state ETFs, all fueled by our deep expertise. Learn More Today’s Animal Spirits is brought to you by Betterment Advisor Solutions…

  • Part II: IEEPA Tariff Ruling’s Losers

        This is Part II; Part I was published here Friday     Soon after the Supreme Court dropped its IEEPA decision Friday morning, I wrote up a post on who the IEEPA decison Winners were. Today, as promised, we review the losers. Spoiler alert: there are a lot of them. In broad strokes,…